← Back to history

Updating to match my edit on 欮. See the explanation there. I copied the format of the 信 entry which was also all meaning components. Should we not have a boilerplate template for 會意字 like there is for 形聲字? It seems like "Phonosemantic compound" is the only character formation type that is always explicitly noted.

Changed fields: gloss, hint, isVerified, components, customSources, strokeDataSimp, fragmentsSimp, historicalImages